We have already handled a crafthousejp.com scam case: 4,725 euros paid for a fake work-from-home job, 75 euros seen back in all, and a 6,346-euro balance that existed only on the screen. The bank blocked the next 8,700-euro transfer. If you were caught by the same scam we can help you.
Note: we are a law firm dealing exclusively with online fraud. If you were caught in the same trap and want help, you can write to us using the form at the bottom of this article.
Why we say crafthousejp.com is a scam
We have already handled the case of a client who lost 4,725 euros on crafthousejp.com, a platform presented as a work-from-home opportunity. Of that money, she saw seventy-five euros come back.
Meanwhile the platform's dashboard showed her a balance of 6,346 euros she was never able to withdraw. And she had been promised that by paying a further 8,700 euros she would receive twenty thousand.
That 8,700-euro transfer never left, and the reason is one of the few pieces of good news in this story: the bank blocked it.
The fake work-from-home job
The first contact arrives as a WhatsApp message: a job offer to be done from home, a few hours a day, no experience required. The crafthousejp.com script is the one we see repeating every week.
The beginning on crafthousejp.com is always favourable. You carry out small operations and real credits arrive, of a few euros: six euros, then another six. Real money, genuinely reaching the account. That is the step that convinces, because it turns a proposal received from a stranger into a relationship that "has already paid".
Then the structure of crafthousejp.com inverts. To access the better-paid activities you must "activate" the task by paying a sum, with the promise that the earnings will exceed the payment. The tasks grow, the amounts grow, and the balance on the screen grows with them. When you try to withdraw, the withdrawal is conditional on a further payment.
At a certain point communications move to a different messaging application. That is not an organisational detail: it serves to leave the earlier history behind, to lose the references and to operate where the victim is less at ease.
The rule that takes it all apart
If we had to leave the reader with a single sentence, it would be this.
You do not pay to do a job.
In any lawful employment relationship money moves in one direction only: from the employer to the worker. There is no serious job in which you must pay to unlock a task, to "activate" a level, to reach a threshold or to release your own pay. The moment you are asked to make a transfer in order to work, the relationship is not a job: it is a collection of money.
The same holds for the variants we meet under other names: product reviews where you have to "order" the goods yourself, packages to "advance", orders to "cover", scores to "complete". The mechanism is identical.
The numbers tell the whole story
It is worth lining up the figures of the crafthousejp.com case, because the ratio between them is the fraud.
Paid in: 4,725 euros. Received: 75 euros, in small initial credits. Shown on the dashboard as available earnings: 6,346 euros. Promised against a further payment of 8,700 euros: 20,000 euros.
The ratio between the seventy-five euros actually received and the 4,725 paid says everything there is to know. The initial credits are not pay: they are an acquisition cost, the investment the organisation makes to obtain a great deal more.
The bank that blocks the transfer
In the crafthousejp.com case the bank, made suspicious by the frequency of the transfers, blocked the 8,700-euro operation.
We flag this because many people experience such a block as an injustice or a nuisance, whereas in this case it avoided a loss almost three times larger. When a bank calls to confirm an operation, or suspends it, it is not making life difficult: its anti-fraud systems have recognised a pattern. That deserves listening to.
There is then a point to know, and on which it is best not to raise false hopes. Transfers ordered by the victim are authorised operations: they therefore fall outside the refund regime laid down for unauthorised transactions, which applies to the fraudulent use of payment instruments. That does not mean nothing can be done with the bank. A recall procedure can be requested towards the beneficiary's bank, with some chance of success only if activated very quickly; complete copies of the payment records with the IBANs can be requested; and since 9 October 2025, under Regulation (EU) 2024/886, European banks must check that the beneficiary's name matches the IBAN: if a mismatch warning appeared when the transfer was made, that warning belongs in the complaint. Where the intermediary's conduct is itself disputed, the Italian Banking and Financial Ombudsman remains available.
Italian accounts are an advantage
In the case we examined the transfers went both to foreign accounts and to Italian accounts.
That changes a great deal. An Italian IBAN corresponds to a relationship opened with an Italian intermediary, with an account holder identified under legislative decree 231/2007 and with data retained for ten years. That holder is a reachable person: they can be identified and questioned, and money laundering under article 648-bis of the Italian Criminal Code or self-laundering under article 648-ter.1 is assessed in their regard. If sums are still on the account, preventive seizure can be sought under article 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Many victims assume that behind a foreign platform there are only unreachable people. That is not so: the Italian part of the chain is often the most fragile, and that is where you start.
Two hundred and thirty screenshots
The person we followed in the crafthousejp.com case had kept over two hundred and thirty screenshots, all the payment records and the complete conversations.
We mention it because it is exactly what we ask for and almost nobody has. One practical piece of advice on organising them: do not send them unsorted. Put them in chronological order, number them, and prepare a list matching each date to the amount paid, the IBAN and name of the beneficiary, the reason given and the number of the screenshot documenting it. An ordered file is what makes it possible to act quickly; two hundred and thirty unordered images force everything to be reconstructed from scratch and waste the weeks that matter.
What we checked on crafthousejp.com
We found no company name, no VAT number, no registered office and no reference to any authorisation connected to crafthousejp.com.
The public registers show that the domain was registered on 15 September 2026, for the minimum term of one year, with a United States registrar, with its configuration completed less than a minute after purchase. The name evokes Japanese craftsmanship for which there is no evidence whatsoever.
One last detail: crafthousejp.com has no mail server configured. No email can be received at that address. An entity claiming to entrust paid work to collaborators and unreachable in writing at its own domain is not an employer.
The criminal framework
The conduct of whoever ran crafthousejp.com amounts to fraud under article 640 of the Italian Criminal Code, aggravated under the second paragraph no. 2-bis for exploiting the circumstance of distance referred to in article 61 no. 5, and by the aggravating circumstance introduced in paragraph 2-ter by law 90/2024, applicable because the facts date from 2026. The aggravating circumstance of reduced capacity to defend oneself carries particular weight in this kind of scheme, which deliberately selects people looking to supplement their income.
The repeated payments to crafthousejp.com are not separate episodes: they constitute a single criminal design, to be charged as a continuing offence under article 81, second paragraph. As regards whoever made the destination accounts available, money laundering under article 648-bis or self-laundering under article 648-ter.1 is relevant, and the use of false identities in chat amounts to impersonation under article 494.
Banking records can be obtained for ten years under article 119, fourth paragraph, of the Consolidated Banking Law. Aggravated fraud becomes time-barred after six years, up to seven years and six months with interrupting acts; the civil claim follows the longer term under article 2947, third paragraph, of the Civil Code. For sums that left Italy, the European Investigation Order under legislative decree 108/2017 applies.
What to do now
Do not pay any more money to crafthousejp.com, whatever the stated reason and whatever balance the dashboard shows you. File a criminal complaint as soon as possible, because timing affects the chance of acting on the destination accounts. Prepare the ordered file described above. Ask your bank for complete copies of the payment records with the beneficiaries' IBANs. And do not turn to anyone who contacts you promising immediate recovery in exchange for an advance payment: after a fraud like this, those contacts almost always arrive.
We can help you
Our firm deals exclusively with online fraud and has already handled cases entirely comparable to crafthousejp.com: fake jobs from home, tasks to be "unlocked" by paying, small initial credits used as bait and balances that exist only on a screen.
If you have paid money to crafthousejp.com or to a platform working the same way, contact us using the form at the bottom of this page: we will review the documents and tell you honestly what concrete prospects exist in your case.
You can read other comparable cases we have handled:
Do you need legal assistance?
Tell us about your case: free assessment, no obligation.
